Grids

Need to be able to summarise points a lot more.
This could come when I understand the domain to a better degree - for now I need to maintain a narrative in the points as an anchor for myself.

There seems to be emerging a picture of designers stepping out of the safe confines and daring to dirty themselves in "messy" situations even if they get flak for it from their more traditional, "scientific" colleagues.

Maybe it is not even a conscious decision to go against the flow.
Maybe the naturalistic setting in which learning occurs, with so many individuals, with so many variables could just no longer be ignored?
Is it going to be possible to fit this into the traditional theoretical setting?
How much does teaching have to change?
How much does traditional, scientific, theory have to change?
Surely if Nobel Laureates have stepped away from certain traditions in order to enable them to make the quantum leaps they have this says something about the confines of the tradition and how it may no longer fit with enabling new discoveries?
BUT!
First they got their scientific, theoretical grounding.
Then this enabled them to critically evaluate it to see how it did not fit to with allowing them jump to see things from a completely different paradigm.

I wish there was some group of peers I could debate this with.